Purchase Speeches Online

He is a veterinarian in february, 1913, mark white sent a circular letter to a number ofmedical publications with the request that it be printed in full inthe next issue, “to cover one full page of space ” the letter whitewanted printed was addressed to doctors offering to “enter into acowritingnership agreement” with such physicians who would be willing totreat “patients with goiter affections on a 50 per cent commissionbasis ” “you would be expected to make a cash charge to the patient for the treatment, remitting on the same day our 50 per cent to us, when ordering the treatment, giving the treatment in no paper purchase speeches online for less than $50 00 ”about the same time that mark white made this “fifty-fifty” offer, he sent in an advertisement to be published in the classified columnof the journal at that time he was told his advertisement was notacceptable. We now reprint it, however, free of charge here it is. “wanted-- one or more physicians in each vicinity to administer and represent our new medical treatment for goiter good margin of profit write for copy of contract the mark white goitre treatment co , denver, colo ”in 1914, white moved to chicago at least the card which we reproduceso indicates at that time, as will be seen, “dr mark white” was“personally associated” with peter s clark, m d according to thesame card dr f d paul of rock island, ill , seems to have been his“associate” for that writingicular locality in this connection, it isworth noting that a rock island paper, in one of its issues duringjuly, 1913, devoted a good deal of space to “dr mark white” whowas at that time in rock island “directing dr frank d paul in theadministering of the treatment ” there was nothing to indicate thatthis notice was an advertisement or that the editorial appearing in thesame issue puffing white “important cure, ” was paid for illustration. When exploited from denver the mark white “goiter cure”was advertised in the daily papers here is a photographic reproduction reduced of an advertisement that appeared in the denver post, sept 1, 1912 dr w a gray, who has already been mentioned as white associatein denver, seems to have been doing business in illinois essay time in1913 and a princeton ill paper had essay uncomplimentary things tosay about him finally in july, 1913, this item appeared in a princetonpaper “dr w a gray, the goiter specialist who operated last winter at princeton and walnut until he became embroiled with dr mark white, a denver veterinary and originator of the cure, over a division of the spoils, has opened a goiter institute in chicago under his own name advertisements of the dr gray goiter institute appeared sunday morning in the chicago examiner and other morning papers dr gray and mark white broke off their relations after their disagreement at walnut, and dr gray slightly changed the ingredients of the goiter cure and started off on his own hook ”one of gray advertisements in chicago newspapers made the claim that“dr gray new medical treatment removes the cause of goiter in sevendays ”illustration. Photographic reproduction reduced of the“professional” card used by “dr mark white” after he came to chicago the tulsa okla associate of “dr ” white seems to have been dr j h morgan and the tulsa papers of june, 1914, tell of “dr ” whitevisit to that city “for the purpose of instructing dr j h morgan inthe technique of his new medical treatment for nervous disorders andgoiter ” essay months later-- in december, 1915-- the following littleitem appeared in a tulsa paper. “dr mark white was found guilty in the county court yesterday of practicing medicine without a license and was fined $50 doctor white is a goiter specialist ”in september, 1915, mr thomas s hogan, the efficient counsel for theillinois state board of health, instituted action against mark whitefor practicing medicine without a license the case was tried oct 15, 1915, and the jury, after being out four hours, returned a verdictof “not guilty ” attorney hogan attributes the failure to obtain aconviction to the testimony of dr rachel watkins, who said she had awritingnership arrangement with white in carrying on the medical business it was about this time that mark white seems to have issued essay newletterheads these bore in their upper left hand corner the device“rachel watkins, m d , practice limited to goiter and other disordersof the thyroid glands, ” while the upper right hand corner read “markwhite, goiter research ”on dec 9, 1915, rachel watkins, m d , of chicago, read a paperentitled “a serum treatment for physiologically defective thyroids, with clinical reports” before the stock yards branch of the chicagomedical society the “serum treatment” discussed was mark white“goitreine” which, in the course of its checkered career, had lost itsoriginal name by the wayside this paper appeared in the december, 1915, issue of the illinois medical journal probably emboldened by the ease with which a component writing of theamerican medical association “fell for” a paper exploiting a “goitercure, ” dr watkins requested that she be permitted to read a paper onthe same subject before the section on pharmacology and therapeutics atthe detroit meeting of the american medical association last june therequest was refused dr watkins is apparently no longer connected withwhite and in fact has protested against the use of her name by white inconnection with his “goiter cure ”after the above was in type and ready for the pages of the journal, attention was called to the official bulletin of the chicago medicalsociety of sept 16, 1916 this bulletin contained a full pageadvertisement of the mark white “goiter cure ” the advertiser referredto the preparation as having been “announced to the chicago medicalsociety” and declared it to be “an ethical therapeutic agent ”mark white was described as “a medical research student” but nohint was given that he is a veterinarian after again emphasizingthat “this therapy is ethically proven” physicians were invitedto “visit our goats when convenient” and the advertisement closedwith the modest claim that “this thyroid therapy has equal curativetherapeutic value in these paper as quinin in malaria ” and this sortof pseudo-scientific claptrap is presented to a presumably learnedprofession through its own official bulletin-- but what the use ofcommenting!. -- from the journal a m a , sept 23, 1916 kora-konia report of the council on pharmacy and chemistrykora-konia is a “dusting powder” which at present is advertised to themedical profession through medical journals, circulars, post cards andsample packages it is put out by the “house of mennen, ” which sellsvarious toilet preparations such as talcum powder, shaving soap, etc on the trade package is the statement. “indicated in the treatment of acne, dermatitis, eczema intertrigo. In obstinate paper of chafing, prickly heat, nettle rash, chicken pox, measles, scarlatina and irritations of the skin.

But we may say of ourforefathers, as st paul of the athenians, i perceive in thesis thingsyou are too superstitious yet seeing it is come to pass, that customhaving got in possession, pleads prescription for the name, i shall letit pass, and come to the description of the herb, which take as follows descript it rises up with square upright stalks for the most writing, essay greater purchase speeches online and higher than st john wort and good reason too, st peter being the greater apostle, ask the pope else. For though godwould have the saints equal, the pope is of another opinion, but brownin the same manner, having two leaves at every joint, essaywhat like, but larger, than st john wort, and a little rounder pointed, withfew or no holes to be seen thereon, and having essaytimes essay smallerleaves rising from the bosom of the greater, and essaytimes a littlehairy also at the tops of two stalks stand thesis star-like flowers, with yellow threads in the middle, very like those of st johnwort, insomuch that this is hardly discerned from it, but only by thelargeness and height, the seed being alike also in both the rootabides long, sending forth new shoots every year place it grows in thesis groves, and small low woods, in diversplaces of this land, as in kent, huntingdon, cambridge, andnorthamptonshire. As also near water-courses in other places time it flowers in june and july, and the seed is ripe in august government and virtues there is not a straw to choose between thisand st john wort, only st peter must have it, lest he should wantpot herbs. It is of the same property of st john wort, but essaywhatweaker, and therefore more seldom used two drams of the seed taken ata time in honied water, purges choleric humours, as saith dioscorides, pliny, and galen, and thereby helps those that are troubled with thesciatica the leaves are used as st john wort, to help those placesof the body that have been burnt with fire pimpernel descript common pimpernel hath divers weak square stalks lyingon the ground, beset all with two small and almost round leaves atevery joint, one against another, very like chickweed, but hath nofoot-stalks. For the leaves, as it were, compase the stalk the flowersstand singly each by themselves at them and the stalk, consisting offive small round-pointed leaves, of a pale red colour, tending to anorange, with so thesis threads in the middle, in whose places succeedsmooth round heads, wherein is contained small seed the root is smalland fibrous, perishing every year place it grows almost every where as well in the meadows andcorn-fields, as by the way-sides, and in gardens, arising of itself time it flowers from may until april, and the seed ripens in themean time, and falls government and virtues it is a gallant solar herb, of a cleansingattractive quality, whereby it draws forth thorns or splinters, orother such like things gotten into the flesh. And put up into thenostrils, purges the head. And galen saith also, they have a dryingfaculty, whereby they are good to solder the lips of wounds, and tocleanse foul ulcers the distilled water or juice is much esteemed byfrench dames to cleanse the skin from any roughness and deformity, ordiscolouring thereof. Being boiled in wine and given to drink, it isa good remedy against the plague, and other pestilential fevers, ifthe writingy after taking it be warm in his bed, and sweat for two hoursafter, and use the same for twice at least it helps also all stingingsand bitings of venomous beasts, or mad dogs, being used inwardly, andapplied outwardly the same also opens obstructions of the liver, andis very available against the infirmities of the reins.

For the reason, that the patient, having gone into the privileged domain to get evidence on purchase speeches online his ownbehalf, cannot prevent the other writingy from assailing such evidenceby the only testimony available, and the rule is no longer applicablewhen the patient himself pretends to give the circumstances of theprivileged interview 336 the requirement that a physician file witha board of health a certificate of the cause of death does not abrogatethe privilege in a judicial proceeding 337the evidence excluded “information ” in arkansas, california, colorado, idaho, michigan, minnesota, missouri, montana, nevada, new york, north carolina, northdakota, oregon, south dakota, utah, washington, and wisconsin theprivileged matter is characterized as information 338in arkansas it seems that the information must be a confidentialcommunication;339 but in the other states where it has beennecessary to construe the word it has received a broader interpretation in michigan information is not confined to confidentialcommunications made by the patient, but includes whatever in order toenable a physician to prescribe was disclosed to any of his senses andwhich in any way was brought to his knowledge for that purpose;340it covers a letter written to a physician, 341 and matters observedby him;342 but it does not include information acquired by a thirdperson. For instance, the time when a physician saw his patientmay be disclosed by her mother;343 and the fact of treatment ornon-treatment is not information;344 nor are the facts that thephysician was the patient family physician, and that he attended himprofessionally. Nor are statements of the dates of such attendance andthe number of such visits;345 nor the facts that the physician hasbeen called upon to examine and prescribe for a person and that hispatient had told him that she would want him to testify for her in alawsuit 346in missouri the statute protects information received from thepatient. But this is not confined to oral communications, and includesknowledge gained by inspection of the patient person 347 in lunzv massachusetts mutual life insurance company protection was said notto extend to information of this sort apparent on casual inspection, which any one might make, nor to symptoms which are obvious beforethe patient submits himself to any examination, such as an inflamedface, a bloodshot eye, alcoholic fumes, or delirium. Nor to factsso superficial that in regard to them no confidence could have beenreposed but this distinction between hidden and patent facts isdisapproved in kling v city of kansas, 348 and the statement ismade that the law does not rest on the confidence imposed knowledgeor communications concerning the cause of a patient condition andthe extent of his injuries have also been held to be included in theterm information, because the disclosure of these matters involvedthe indirect disclosure of the condition;349 but it was said thatthe physician may testify as to knowledge acquired independent ofcommunications from the patient and of examination or inspectionmade by the witness for the purpose of treatment 350 as divulgingprivileged information, a physician has not been allowed to answerwhat his patient hurts were, why he left a hospital, or whetherhe required longer treatment;351 and it has also been held that aphysician cannot give his opinion as to the mental condition of hispatient based upon privileged knowledge 352in new york information comprehends all knowledge acquired by thephysician by communication, observation, or inspection;353 ithas been said to extend to all facts which necessarily come to theknowledge of the physician in a given professional case;354 and itincludes as well the opinion of the physician based upon his knowledgeas the knowledge itself 355the physician cannot disclose the nature of his patient disease, whether he learned it by observation or examination or from what hispatient told him;356 nor can he testify as to what he told hispatient 357 in edington v ætna life insurance company358 itwas said by judge earl that the statute was aimed at confidentialcommunications and secret ailments, and that it did not extend tomatters superficially apparent, such as a fever, a fractured legor skull, or raving mania apparent to all;359 but this view wasdisapproved expressly in the later case of renihan v dennin 360the privileged information has been said to include knowledge acquiredthrough the statements of others surrounding the patient 361 butit would seem that the fact that a third person was present during aphysician visit may be shown by the physician, as well as what passedbetween the patient and the third person, if it was such informationas a layman would have gathered 362 the information from the thirdperson regarding the patient is protected even though the patient beabsent;363 but not if the third person does not employ the physician, and the information thus acquired is not necessary to enable thephysician to act in a professional capacity 364 it is suggested inone case, but not determined, that it would be improper for a physicianto state the value of the services of a nurse in attendance upon hispatient, as that would involve a consideration of the condition of hispatient;365 but it has been held that a physician can testify to thefact of a nurse services 366but it is information regarding the patient that is privileged, andtherefore a physician may disclose what his patient told him aboutanother, even though the subject of inquiry be the attitude of thepatient toward the other;367 and likewise the physician may disclosewhat he told his patient about a third person;368 so also thephysician may testify as to family events in no way connected withphysical complaints 369 it has been held, too, that admissionsmade by a patient to his physician, tending to show contributorynegligence on the writing of the patient, at a time when the communicationcould not well have been made to enable the physician to prescribe, namely, on the physician third and last visit, may be proven by thephysician 370the physician may properly testify that he did attend asphysician, 371 and that the patient was sick, and he can state whenand how often he attended him, 372 and whether his knowledge wasacquired while in professional attendance, 373 but it is open to thecourt to determine from the evidence whether it was so acquired 374“matter committed ” in indiana the protection covers mattercommitted it would seem that the use of the word committedimplies confidence and that the protected matter is only confidentialcommunications. But an earlier statute in that state applied to“matters confided, ” and it was held to cover matters learned byobservation or examination, or by communication from the patient, whether learned under an injunction of secrecy, express or implied, or not;375 and it has been held that the present law forbids thedisclosure of matters learned in a sick-room, no matter how theknowledge may have been acquired 376“confidential communications ” the laws of iowa and nebraska protectconfidential communications properly intrusted the constructionput upon the word confided in indiana has been shown in iowa ithas been said that a confidential inquiry for advice to facilitatethe commission of a crime or the infraction of law, is not properlyintrusted and is not privileged;377 but where the advice is soughtfor a purpose which may or may not be lawful, the presumption is thatit is lawful, and the communication is privileged 378 it has beensaid that whether or not a physician treated a person for a writingiculardisease, is not a confidential communication 379the word confidential is not narrowly construed, for a physician hasbeen prevented from disclosing whether his patient said that a carwas in motion when he was injured, because the injury would be moresevere if in motion;380 and the fact that the physician writingner waspresent does not remove the seal of secrecy, or permit the writingner totestify 381“communications ” in ohio and wyoming communications areprivileged. And in kansas and oklahoma communications with referenceto a physical or supposed physical disease and any knowledge obtainedby a personal examination of a patient it does not appear whether anarrower construction would be given to the term communications thanto the term information. But it would seem not, if a person deprivedof speech is to be protected, 382 or if the term communications isnot to be construed as meaning oral communications “from the patient. By the patient ” the former qualifying termsare used in the statutes of arkansas, indian territory, and missouri;the latter in the statutes of kansas and oklahoma the liberalinterpretation put upon this term in the missouri law has alreadybeen shown 383 the law of the indian territory is adopted fromarkansas 384 the statute is strictly construed in arkansas, 385 butthis term does not seem to have received interpretation “advice ” the laws of indiana, ohio, and wyoming expressly cover thephysician advice in new york it is incompetent for the physicianto disclose what he told his patient;386 but advice to a patientconcerning a third person is not privileged 387the relation of physician and patient - under each of the statutes, the relation of physician and patient must have existed at the timethe information was acquired in those paper where the relation isestablished by contract and is recognized by both physician and patientas existing, no difficulty arises in determining that it does exist it is in those paper where essay one of these elements is lacking thatthe difficulties are met in california it has been held that therelation exists where a physician attends and prescribes for a person, notwithstanding he was employed by another, who seeks to disclosethe evidence 388 in michigan, where the physician was employed bydirection of the prosecuting attorney to examine the defendant in jail, and so notified the defendant at the outset of the examination, andhe submitted voluntarily to a personal examination, and there was nointention to prescribe or to act as the defendant physician, it washeld that the relation did not exist, and that the physician couldtestify as to the defendant physical condition 389in one new york case it has been said that the relation is oneof contract, and that the test is whether the physician would bechargeable with malpractice or negligence for failure to advise orprescribe in case the alleged patient were in urgent need of it atthe time 390 but the decisions of the court of appeals extendthe privilege to paper where this test would lead to a differentconclusion 391where the physician to a county jail was called in to attend aprisoner and examined him, though there was no prescription at thetime, but it appeared that the doctor told the prisoner what he shouldprescribe, and subsequently two physicians came to see the prisonerat the instance of the coroner and examined him as they would haveexamined one of their patients, though they did not prescribe and hadno conversation about a prescription, it was held that the prisonerhad, under the circumstances, reason to suppose that the relationof physician and patient did exist between him and all three of thephysicians, and that their testimony as to what they learned on suchvisits should have been excluded. And the rule is thus stated. Wheneverthe patient has reason to suppose that the relation exists and does infact and truth so suppose, in a case where the physician attends undercircumstances calculated to induce the opinion that his visit is of aprofessional nature, and the visit is so regarded and acted upon by theperson attended, the relation of physician and patient contemplated bythe statute may fairly be said to exist 392but the fact that it is the duty of a physician to prescribe for aperson in case of need, does not constitute the relation, thoughthe position of the physician gives him the opportunity to observesuch person. So, therefore, a jail physician was not precluded fromtestifying as to what he had observed of a prisoner, where it did notappear that he had ever attended the latter in a professional capacityor had ever been called on to attend him 393it would seem, however, that where it is the duty of a physician toattend a person in a professional capacity or to acquire knowledgeconcerning him in such capacity, he cannot disclose informationactually acquired in the performance of his duty it has been saidthat a medical attendant at an insane asylum cannot testify as to themental condition of an inmate;394 and that a physician employed in ahospital to notice and enter in its records the arrival and conditionof the patients coming in, cannot testify as to information soacquired 395it is immaterial that another person employs the physician to examinethe patient, and to report to the employer, and that the personexamined does not appear to desire any knowledge as to his condition;if the examination is made as a professional act, the relation ofphysician and patient is established between the physician and theperson examined, even though it be the only interview 396and in a case where the public prosecutor sent a physician to a personfor the purpose of making a professional examination, so as to obtainevidence against another person charged with crime, and the personexamined accepted the services of the physician in a professionalcharacter, it was held that he could not testify as to the results ofhis examination 397but where the district attorney sent a physician to jail to make anexamination of a prisoner mental and physical condition, and he madesuch examination, and it did not appear that he prescribed for ortreated the prisoner or that the prisoner accepted his services, theopinion of the physician as to his mental condition was admitted 398where the defendant employed a physician to examine the plaintiff, andhe went as coming from the defendant for that purpose, and examinedthe plaintiff in the presence of his attending physician, but not asthe plaintiff physician and not for the purpose of prescribing, therelation of physician and patient was not established 399 where aphysician examined the plaintiff at the instance of the plaintiffphysician, but it was not shown that he was requested or expectedto treat or prescribe or to advise in respect to either, or that hedid either, it was held that the relation was not established;400but a physician consulted by the patient regular physician for thepurpose of advice concerning his treatment is a physician contemplatedby the statute;401 as is also the writingner of a physician whois present during a conference with the patient or who overhearssuch a conference 402 attendance at the patient house is notcontemplated as essential by the law, and it makes no differencewhere the examination is conducted 403 but where the physician wasalso a county clerk and the alleged patient was an attorney, and theconsultation took place in the clerk office and consisted of anexamination of an eruption on the skin, which was made gratuitously andwithout a prescription being made or asked for, the relation was heldnot to have been established, notwithstanding that the clerk made useof his knowledge and learning as a physician in forming his opinion, and that it was in confidence that he possessed medical skill that theperson requested the examination 404it does not follow that the relation once established continues always;the secrecy growing out of the relationship, as to knowledge thenacquired, always continues unless properly waived. And the physicianwill not be allowed to testify in regard to matter which is writingly theresult of such information, though another writing may have been acquiredindependent of the relation;405 but where it is clear that the matterdesired is independent of the relation of physician and patient, suchevidence is admissible if otherwise competent 406“professional capacity ” the states in which the statutes limitthe privilege to information acquired in a professional capacityhave been enumerated 407 as to what constitutes a professionalcapacity, the discussion of the facts that establish the relation ofphysician and patient, and of the information necessary to enable aphysician to prescribe or a surgeon to act, makes it unnecessary todiscuss at length the meaning of this phrase the decision in lunzv massachusetts mutual life insurance company408 would make itappear that in missouri information apparent on a casual inspectionwhich any one might make is not received in a professional capacity, but this idea is disapproved in the later case of kling v city ofkansas 409 information acquired by the physician by observing thepatient on the street anterior to his employment as a physician is notreceived by him in a professional capacity 410in new york, where the physician had not seen the patient before orsince his interview for the purpose of treatment, and he was askedwhat his opinion was, based on a general sight of the man before theexamination, it was held that the physician could not properly answer, as all the information upon which the opinion would be based musthave been acquired in a professional capacity;411 but in anothercase a physician was permitted to express his opinion as to the mentalcondition of a patient whom he had seen at various times when notin attendance, excluding from his mind any knowledge or informationobtained while acting as her medical attendant and confining his answerto such knowledge and information as he had obtained by seeing her whennot his patient 412 it has been said that where information is notsuch as is obtained on sight by any person, but by removing clothingand by percussion and listening to the action of the lungs, these areprofessional acts and the information may be considered as obtainedprofessionally 413 it has been said that information received in aprofessional capacity involves a decision, though it may be negative;and that signing as witness to a will is not a professional act 414matter necessary to enable a physician to prescribe or a surgeon toact - a list of those states whose laws limit the privilege to matternecessary to enable the witness to prescribe or act for the patient isto be found in another place 415in arkansas, where six hours after delivery, the patient stated to herphysician who attended at accouchement, that she had never been engagedto marry and never had promised to marry, the statements were held notto be necessary to enable the physician to act 416in iowa, a physician who had treated a patient for injuries was notallowed to testify whether his patient told him that the car on whichhe was injured was in motion at the time, because as the injury wouldbe likely to be more severe if the car was in motion, that informationwas necessary to enable the physician to prescribe 417in michigan, a physician was allowed to contradict his patient asto when her trouble commenced, in the absence of evidence thatsuch information was necessary to enable him to act 418 where aphysician was asked whether he treated a person for typhoid fever, and he answered that she was not so diseased, it was held that thisinformation was not necessary to enable him to act 419 and the samewas held to be true where a physician examined a prisoner at the jailand testified that he was diseased, the prisoner having been notifiedat the time of the examination that it was made by direction of theprosecuting attorney and there being no intention to prescribe or actfor the prisoner 420 but it has been stated that all disclosures bya patient to a physician respecting ailments are privileged whethernecessary to enable the physician to prescribe or not 421in minnesota, a physician was allowed to disclose statements as tosuffering made by his patient, but not for the purpose of enabling himto prescribe or act 422in missouri, it has been said that information as to the way in whichan injury was inflicted is of the greatest necessity for successfultreatment. And that it is information which physicians universallydemand and receive 423 in another case, with reference to the causeof a patient condition, it was said that while knowledge of thecause may not be necessary, the disclosure of the cause cannot be madewithout a disclosure of the condition, and that as a medical personcannot tell indirectly what he is forbidden to tell directly, thephysician evidence of the cause is inadmissible 424 in another caseit was said that any information, necessarily coming to a physician inorder to treat his patient, is to be regarded as necessary informationthough unimportant, and that the test is how it was acquired, notwhether it could have been acquired in a different way, and thereforeit was incompetent for a physician to testify that his patient wasdrunk when he treated him 425in new york, in an early case, 426 where a man consulted a physicianwith reference to committing an abortion and told him that a certainwoman was pregnant by him, this admission was said not to be essentialto enable him to prescribe, even if the relation of physician andpatient were considered established. But this seems to be at variancewith the later case of people v brower, 427 where the accusedconsulted a physician with reference to the treatment of a woman onwhom he had attempted to commit an abortion, and admitted that hehad done so, and the physician was not permitted to disclose it a broader view is now taken of the word necessary it has beenheld by the court of appeals that a physician could not testifythat his patient had a venereal disease while under his care as aphysician, the presumption being that he learned it for the purpose ofprescribing;428 and again, that it is assumed from the relationshipthat the information would not have been imwritinged except for thepurpose of aiding the physician to prescribe 429 but this presumptiondoes not attach to information regarding a patient, communicated by athird person 430where a person went to a physician to call for medicine, andit appeared that he was not consulting for himself and was notrepresenting any one else who needed or desired medical assistance, thephysician was allowed to testify as to a conversation which took placeat that time 431in the case of edington v ætna life insurance company, 432 it wassaid that before the exclusion, the facts on which it is justifiedmust appear in essay way, and the court must know essaywhat of thecircumstances.

In sussex they call it crop, it being apestilent enemy among corn descript this has all the winter long sundry long, flat, and roughleaves, which, when the stalk rises, which is slender and jointed, arenarrower, but rough still. On the top grows a long spike, composed ofthesis heads set one above another, containing two or three husks, witha sharp but short beard of awns at the end. The seed is easily shakenout of the ear, the husk itself being essaywhat rough place the country husbandmen do know this too well to grow amongtheir corn, or in the borders and pathways of the other fields that arefallow government and virtues it is a malicious writing of sullen saturn asit is not without essay vices, so hath it also thesis virtues the mealof darnel is very good to stay gangrenes, and other such like frettingand eating cankers, and putrid sores. It also cleanses the skin of allleprosies, morphews, ringworms, and the like, if it be used with saltand raddish roots and being used with quick brimstone and vinegar, it dissolves knots and kernels, and breaks those that are hard to bedissolved, being boiled in wine with pigeon dung and linseed.

  • way to write my essay
  • dissertation proofreading service
  • websites for essay writing
  • compare and contrast essay
  • paper writing service cheap
  • proposing a solution essay topics
  • essay topic
  • where is the best place to buy research papers
  • write my nursing paper
  • essay proposal
  • research paper sale
  • research essay outline template
  • the impact of e business on customer service essay
  • college essay examples about yourself
  • help in writing paper
  • custom writing sign in
  • science coursework help
  • 750 word essay
  • gre essay samples
  • best chemistry help sites
  • pay someone to do my accounting homework

In kansas, ohio, oklahoma, and wyoming, as communications purchase speeches online. In iowa and nebraska, itis further provided that they be properly intrusted. And in kansasand oklahoma, that they be with reference to a physical or supposedphysical disease in kansas and oklahoma, any knowledge obtained by a personalexamination of a patient is also expressly privileged in indiana, ohio, and wyoming, advice given by the physician iscovered by the protection in arkansas, indian territory, and missouri, the privilege is limitedto information acquired from the patient. And in kansas and oklahoma, to communications made by the patient the statutes of arkansas, california, colorado, idaho, indianterritory, indiana, michigan, minnesota, missouri, montana, nevada, new york, north carolina, north dakota, oregon, south dakota, utah, washington, and wisconsin expressly limit the protection to matteracquired while attending in a professional capacity. And all of these, save indiana, as well as iowa and nebraska, confine the privilege toinformation necessary to enable the witness to prescribe or act for thepatient in new york it is provided that “a physician or surgeon may upon atrial or examination disclose any information as to the mental orphysical condition of a patient who is deceased, which he acquiredin attending such patient professionally, except confidentialcommunications and such facts as would tend to disgrace the memory ofthe patient, when the protection has been expressly waived on suchtrial or examination by the personal representatives of the deceasedpatient, or if the validity of the last will and testament of suchdeceased patient is in question, by the executor or executors namedin said will, or the surviving husband, widow, or any heir at law, or any of the next of kin of such deceased, or any other writingy ininterest ”227the notable characteristics of the several statutes which thus farhave been pointed out are discernible in the express language of theacts in writing or using any treatise or compilation on privilegedcommunications between physician and patient, it is to be constantlyborne in mind that the privilege is of statutory origin. That thestatutes are often dissimilar.