History

Personal Statement For Sale


And the same statute, 357, made it a misdemeanor for a person, whether licensed or not, to practise medicine or surgery, or do anyother act as a physician or surgeon, while intoxicated, by which thelife of any person is endangered or his health seriously affected 155giving “patented” medicines no exception personal statement for sale - at one time an attempt wasmade to claim, that under the patent laws of the united states a personhad the right to administer patent medicines without being punishablefor practising without a license, but this doctrine was repudiated bythe courts thompson v staats, 15 wend , 395. Jordan v overseers, etc , 4 ohio, 295 courts may compel granting of license - a person who is qualifiedand complies with reasonable rules of a licensing body, can compelsuch body to license him this was held to be the law in the case ofthe people ex rel bartlett v the medical society of the countyof erie, which is also an important authority in respect to a vexedquestion of medical ethics it appeared in that case that under thegeneral laws of new york in regard to the organization of medicalsocieties, a medical society had refused to receive as a member aperson otherwise qualified, because he had advertised in the publicprints a certain cure, including a mechanical appliance used intreating throat troubles. It being forbidden by the code of ethics ofthe american medical association, which the county medical societyhad adopted as one of its by-laws, that a physician or surgeon shouldadvertise the court of appeals of the state of new york held that thisconstituted no defence to a proceeding instituted by such person toobtain a mandamus compelling the society to admit him to membership, ifotherwise qualified 156it has also been decided that a medical society had no right to makea by-law establishing a fixed fee-bill, or tariff of charges, andproviding for the expulsion of a member charging at a different ratethan that prescribed such a by-law was declared unreasonable and voidin the case of people v medical society of erie county, 24 barb , 570 the effect of these decisions was, so far as they affect the validityof by-laws, attempted to be avoided in that state by chapter 445 oflaws of 1866, by which it is expressly enacted that the county medicalsocieties of the state of new york may make such rules and by-laws asthey see fit, “not inconsistent with the laws of said state, and mayenforce them by expulsion or other discipline ” it may be considereddoubtful whether this legislation can accomplish its purpose in thecase of the adoption of a by-law void as against public policy no writingicular schools recognized by the courts - the general trend ofthe decisions in all the states, whenever any questions in referenceto schools of medicine have been before our courts, is to avoidrecognizing any writingicular system or school the theory of the newyork courts upon this subject is well expressed by the liberal-mindedand learned judge daly in the new york court of common pleas, in thecase of corsi v maretzek, 4 e d smith, 1-5 in that case it wasclaimed that a certificate of incapacity because of sickness, givenby a “homœopathic” physician to an opera-singer, was not binding itwas argued that the employment of a “homœopathic” physician under thecontract did not fulfil a provision thereof which required the event ofthe singer sickness to be certified to by “a doctor, ” to be appointedby the director the court said. “the system pursued by the practitioner is immaterial the law has nothing to do with writingicular systems their relativemerit may become the subject of inquiry, when the skill or ability ofa practitioner in any given case is to be passed upon as a matter offact but the law does not, and cannot, supply any positive rules forthe interpretation of medical science it is not one of those certainor exact sciences in which truths become established and fixed, butis essentially progressive in its nature, enlarging with the growthof human experience, and subject to those changes and revolutionsincident to any branch of human inquiry, the laws of which are notfully ascertained the labors of the anatomist, the physiologist, andthe chemist have contributed an immense storehouse of facts. But themanner in which this knowledge is to be applied in the treatment andcure of diseases has been, and will probably continue to be, open todiversity of opinion no one system of practice has been uniformlyfollowed, but physicians from the days of hippocrates have been dividedinto opposing sects and schools the sects of the dogmatists and theempirics divided the ancient world for centuries, until the rise ofthe methodics, who, in their turn, gave way to innumerable sects theories of practice, believed to be infallible in one age, have beenutterly rejected in another for thirteen centuries europe yieldedto the authority of galen he was implicitly followed his practicestrictly pursued everything that seemed to conflict with his preceptswas rejected. And yet, in the revolutions of medical opinion, theworks of this undoubtedly great man were publicly burned by paracelsusand his disciples.

“tri-arsenole no 1 equals to each ampoule, gr sodium chlorid 4-1/2 hydrarg chlor -cor 1/4 arsenous acid 1/4 sodium benzoate 4 hydrastin resinoid 2 tri-arsenole no 2 equals to each ampoule, sodium chlorid 4 hydrarg chlor -cor 1/2 arsenous acid 1/2 sodium benzoate 4 hydrastin resinoid 2 tri-arsenole no 3 equals to each ampoule, sodium chlorid 3-1/2 hydrarg chlor -cor 3/4 arsenous acid 3/4 sodium benzoate 4 hydrastin resinoid 2 tri-arsenole no 4 equals to each ampoule, sodium chlorid 3 hydrarg chlor -cor 1 arsenous acid 1 sodium benzoate 4 hydrastin resinoid 2the request for information regarding the animal experiments said tohave determined the toxicity was ignored, nor were references suppliedto clinical reports demonstrating the value of the product the council declared tri-arsenole inadmissible to new and nonofficialremedies because of conflict with the rules as follows:in the absence of details of the method used, the claim that thepreparation has been tested biologically is in conflict with rule 2, which requires that for preparations claimed to be physiologicallystandardized the method of testing must be published so as to permit ofcontrol by independent investigators the claims that “merco-arseno-benzo-chloride” is “the result of thesisyears research, ” that its “toxicity has been fully tested upon animalsbefore using clinically” and that clinical use has “proven suchcomplete success” have not been substantiated by evidence and must beheld as unwarranted the name is in conflict with rule 8, which requires that pharmaceuticalmixtures shall bear names descriptive of their composition further, the name “tri-arsenole” by its similarity to diarsenol, the canadianbrand of arseno-phenolamin hydrochlorid, suggests that thispharmaceutical mixture is a chemical compound similar to salvarsan moreover, the danger of confusion is increased by the addition ofthe hydrastis preparation which imwritings a yellow color like that ofsalvarsan to the solution obtained when the colorless mercury andarsenic compounds of the mixture are dissolved again, the synonym“merco-arseno-benzo-chloride” conveys the false impression thattri-arsenole is a definite chemical compound the label does not declare the poisonous constituents claimed tobe contained in the mixture. Namely, “arsenous acid” and corrosivemercuric chlorid rule 7 there is no evidence that arsenous acid arsenic trioxid usedintravenously is efficient and safe as a spirocheticide, and theadministration of this drug in conjunction with mercuric chloridin fixed proportion is irrational and dangerous-- writingicularly sobecause of the implied similarity of tri-arsenole to arsenphenolaminhydrochlorid salvarsan, diarsenol rule 10 l o compound no 1 and l o compound no 2 -- in submitting thesepreparations to the council, the medical supply company stated that“no 1” was “composed of the following ingredients. Chloral, camphor, menthol, iodin, and oil of gualtheria, incorporated in a fatty base each ounce contains fifteen grains of chloral hydrate, nine grainsof resublimed iodine ” “no 2” was said to have the same compositionas “no 1” except that the oil of gaultheria had been omitted themedical supply company was informed that the rules of the councilrequired declaration of the amounts of each therapeutic constituentof pharmaceutical mixtures and that, therefore, in addition to theinformation furnished the amounts of camphor, menthol and oil ofgualtheria should be given for “no 1” and the amount of camphor andmenthol for “no 2 ” the following reply was received. “l o compound no 1 equals to each tube, chloral hydrate gr 15 camphor gr 22 menthol gr 7-1/2 iodin resublime gr 3-2/3 oil of gaultheria m 3 petrolatum, q s oz 1 l o compound no 2, the same as above formula for l o c no 1, except the oil of gaultheria which is omitted ”it should be noted that when the preparations were submitted each ounceof the preparation was claimed to contain 9 grains of iodin, whilein the subsequent letter the company declares that they contain only3-2/3 grains to the ounce if it be assumed that the unit intendedis the avoirdupois ounce, the preparation should contain 2 06 percent of iodin according to the first statement and 0 84 per cent ofiodin according to the second statement while the dark color of thepreparations suggested the presence of appreciable amounts of freeiodin, the a m a chemical laboratory reported that an examination ofthe specimens submitted by the medical supply company showed that “no 1” and “no 2” each contained but 0 033 per cent of free iodin. Henceboth preparations are in conflict with rule 1 for both preparations the labels suggest their use for the treatmentof “septic wounds, burns, pustular processes of all varieties, andespecially bronchial troubles ” this constitutes a conflict with rule4 regarding no 1 the advertising circular included with the tradepackage asserts. “its merits have been practically demonstrated in the following conditions we invite your especial attention to its use in diseases of the thoracic cavity, especially bronchitis and pneumonia, rheumatism, lumbago, migraine, neuralgia, orchitis, balanitis, enlarged glands or any disturbance of the lymphatic system, anti-galactagogue, or wherever analgesic action is required ”“no 2” is said to be especially adapted to the needs of the surgeon, it “can be applied in any wound either aseptic or infected ” it isasserted that the usual method of preparing patients for operation maybe discarded and that patients may be operated on after application ofthis ointment. “ we have no other preparation to-day which serves the purpose of l o compound in operative and post operative treatment “it is a powerful antiseptic and germicide combining anesthetic, analgesic and alterative properties ”after attempting to discredit the approved methods of preparing thefield for surgical operations, the advertising circular continues. “method of today. A liberal amount of l o compound no 2 is applied to the intended area of operation, massage thoroughly until absorption is complete patient is ready for operation ”both products are in conflict with rule 6 further, as the names ofthese pharmaceutical mixtures are not descriptive of their composition, they also conflict with rule 8 the use of complex mixtures such as these is irrational and leads tomisplaced confidence on the writing of the physician.

“besides our product thymozene we have been forced to add a uterine wafer to be used in connection with hot thymozene douches in leucorrhea these wafers are simply miracle workers ”in addition to this circular letter there was a membership blankleaflet detailing the marvels of “thymozene ” there was another leafletheaded in very large, black type “influenza” and recommending “ma-ozeantiseptic powder” or “thymozene” for this condition still anotherleaflet accompanying it lauded “intravenous compound loffler” andreprinted laudatory puffs of this preparation that were credited toh h witherstine, m d , rochester, minn , joseph b klinehans, m d , chicago, and the “loring park sanatorium” of minneapolis in addition to personal statement for sale the intravenous compound loffler there is, ofcourse, certain “apparatus for the giving of the treatment” which theintravenous chemical co supplies the “compound” must be given justso, and the intravenous chemical co “reserves the right to refuse tosupply any physician with intravenous compound loffler who, eitherthrough lack of proper apparatus or proper care in preparation ofsolution, or for any reason, uses it in such a manner that will castdiscredit upon it ”the complete apparatus, including 2 ounces of intravenous compound loffler, sells for $24 what is intravenous compound?. apparently, nobody knows except charles l loffler, who asks physicians toinject-- and we regret to say essay are injecting-- this nostrum ofunknown composition into the veins of their patients to a physicianwho had raised the point of secrecy loffler wrote in writing. “i am sure that you will agree with me that it is far better to place this treatment in the hands of competent physicians, such as dr witherstine, and thesis more whose names i will gladly send you, and to protect the honest and competent doctor who investigates and takes up the work, than to publish the formula and give to the unscrupulous a chance to try to make the product and no doubt to claim to cure disease that is beyond hope the formula is not kept secret for profit but is so kept upon the advice of a number of good men who have the interest of the doctor at heart i am willing and anxious to place the product and the results in thousands of paper before the a m a on the one condition that the formula shall be kept secret for the benefit of the reputable physician ”in another letter written more recently to a physician who calledattention to the secrecy of the nostrum, loffler wrote. “the intravenous compound contains approximately 58 per cent oxygen, 12 per cent chlorine, 16 per cent potassium, 9 per cent sodium and 5 per cent boron i have no hesitancy in giving it, and it was due to an incompetent man in this office that this was not given fully in the booklet he made the changes without my consent and has caused me to answer thesis inquiries by physicians ”a seeming frankness is a trick as old as nostrum exploitation itself loffler “formula” is meaningless a quack who was putting out amixture of 1 writing baking soda and 2 writings common salt might with equalfrankness say that his marvelous combination contained approximately35 4 per cent sodium, 4 8 per cent carbon, 19 per cent oxygen, 40 4per cent chlorin, and 0 4 per cent hydrogen in order that the profession might know more about this product aspecimen was turned over to the a m a chemical laboratory foranalysis here is what the chemists report. Chemists’ report“one original 2 ounce bottle of ‘intravenous compound loffler forintravenous use’ was submitted to the association chemical laboratoryfor examination according to the label, the product is sold by the‘intravenous chemical co , chicago ’ the bottle contained a whitegranular substance, which appeared as if the ingredients had beenfused together the product responded to tests for sodium, potassium, chlorate, borate and nitrate as this same set of chemical radicals wasfound by puckner and hilpert j a m a , may 22, 1908, p 1706 to bepresent in ‘oxychlorin’ and ‘zyme-oid, ’ a quantitative comparison of‘intravenous compound loffler’ was made “the analysis indicated that all three products are essentially thesame. intravenous oxychlorin, zyme-oid, compound, per cent per cent per cent potassium k 12 26 13 50 13 79 sodium na 8 20 9 84 9 82 boric acid anhydride b₂o₃ 18 63 13 42 15 20 chlorate clo₃-  25 52 27 53 26 44 nitrate no₃-  21 70 24 22 23 75 water calculated 13 29 10 42 11 72“assuming that the chlorate in ‘intravenous compound loffler’ ispresent as potassium chlorate and the nitrate is present as sodiumnitrate, the figures obtained by the analysis correspond to a mixtureapproximately as follows. Potassium chlorate kclo₃ 38 6 per cent sodium nitrate nano₃ 32 6 per cent potassium borate k₂b₄o₇ 4 9 per cent sodium borate na₂b₄o₇ 4 0 per cent boric acid  21 1 per cent “from the results of the examination it is concluded that thispreparation is a mixture of alkali chlorate and nitrate and boricacid, probably produced by fusing together the constituents it ispractically the same mixture as oxychlorine and zyme-oid as analyzednearly fourteen years ago in the a m a chemical laboratory ”throughout the advertising of “intravenous compound loffler” thephysician is reminded of the financial returns that the product offers “ the financial return will prove as interesting to yourself as results are to the patients ” “and lastly but not less interesting, the financial returns are commensurate with results ” “ the instruction given me in the use of your intravenous compound and the opportunity presented adds four to five hundred dollars per month to my bank account ” “ will not only give you more positive results than have ever obtained in chronic and progressive diseases but a very remunerative business ” “intravenous compound loffler is supplied in granular form, 2 ounces to a bottle, at $2 per bottle an ounce will average fifteen treatments and treatments are at from $3 to $5 each, according to the ability of the patient to pay ”a physician whose name the intravenous chemical company had given asa user of intravenous compound loffler was written to by anotherphysician who was interested in the matter and he was asked frankly forhis opinion he replied in writing. “the treatment makes a profound impression on the recipient and is usually followed by a marked improvement mentally, and i have not been keen enough to draw the line of just how far the physical or material improvement went and when the psychical began “for the office ‘specialist’ of the advertising type this would be a boon, but i am not entirely satisfied that its use completely justifies its claims ” summaryintravenous compound loffler stands revealed as a nostrum of secretcomposition which physicians are asked to inject into the veinsof their patients it must be purchased in connection with essaysupplementary material, “a complete set of apparatus, ” sold by thesame concern its successful administration is said to depend onfollowing a technic detailed either in a booklet sent out by loffleror given by loffler in a “post-graduate course” which costs physicians$50 unless they have purchased six dollars’ worth of another nostrum, “thymozene ”the intravenous administration of drugs is impressive to the patientthe technic is mysterious and its psychic effect striking itsdangers-- infection, air embolism, intravascular clotting, suddendeath-- are matters of record every conservative physician will admitthat there is no excuse for the intravenous administration of eventhose drugs that are well known and whose effects have been carefullystudied, except when distinct advantages are to be secured as thejournal has stated before, “little is known of the results to beexpected from intravenous therapy even with simple substances ”what, then, can be said of the physician who subjects his patients tothe intravenous injection-- “at from $3 to $5 each, according to theability of the patient to pay”-- of a preparation of whose compositionhe is as ignorant as he must be of its effects?. intravenous compound loffler has been on the market ten years. It is unmentioned in theliterature of scientific medicine the name of its exploiter, whilenot unknown in the twilight zone of professionalism as the exploiterof a nostrum, as a “specialist” in “chronic troubles” and “intravenoustherapy, ” as well as in other capacities even less savory, is equallyunknown to scientific medicine -- from the journal a m a , nov 12, 1921 intravenous specialties to the editor:-- there is a salesman here in salt lake city making extravagant claims about the medicines advertised in the enclosed pamphlet would you kindly advise me as to your opinion of it?.

No marks personal statement for sale of injury. Obliquemark of cord on right side of neck. Tip of tongue between the teeth;face essaywhat livid. Right side of heart full of dark blood. Lungscongested posteriorly 62 ibid , p 4 - woman, age 38 rope close under the chin passedupward behind the ears head bent on chest large wound above clavicle under the rope was a depression made after death but no hemorrhage much blood in abdomen and a hole in the liver kidney bruised andblackened right lung torn through. Blood in pleuræ wounds weresupposed to be gunshot, but the husband confessed that he had thrust asharp solid bamboo into her body and afterward hung it up she died ofhemorrhage 63 rehm. Friedreich blät f ger med , 1883, xxxiv , pp 332-362 - man, age 73. First roughly maltreated. Afterward hung 64 tardieu. Op cit , p 125 - woman found hanging in her room circumstances indicated homicidal strangulation and that the hangingwas done to avert suspicion post-mortem examination showed the baseof the tongue ecchymosed, and ecchymosis extending up to the softpalate.

  • reword my essay
  • best place to buy book reports online
  • best buy strategy analysis essays
  • how to write scholarship essay
  • custom research paper help
  • business paper writing services
  • internet letter wriitng service
  • homework help chemistry
  • customer writing in 8 hours
  • how to write a good introduction for an essay
  • college personal narrative essay examples
  • funny argumentative essay topics
  • civil war essay
  • buy biology reasearch paper
  • write my essays for free
  • assignment homework help
  • write my paper one day
  • hamlet character analysis essay
  • what is religion essay
  • c s lewis essay collection and other short pieces
  • sat essay help

This isthe general rule for all simples of this nature chamapitys ground-pine. Hot in the second degree, and dry in thethird, helps the jaundice, sciatica, stopping of the liver, and spleen, provokes the menses, cleanses the entrails, dissolves congealed blood, resists poison, cures wounds and ulcers strong bodies may take a dram, and weak bodies half a dram of it in powder at a time chamæmelum, sativum, sylvestre garden and wild chamomel gardenchamomel, is hot and dry in the first degree, and as gallant a medicineagainst the stone in the bladder as grows upon the earth, you may takeit inwardly, i mean the decoction of it, being boiled in white wine, orinject the juice of it into the bladder with a syringe it expels wind, helps belchings, and potently provokes the menses. Used in baths, ithelps pains in the sides, gripings and gnawings in the belly chamædris, &c germander. Hot and dry in the third degree. Cuts andbrings away tough humours, opens stoppings of the liver and spleen, helps coughs and shortness of breath, stranguary and stopping of urine, and provokes the menses. Half a dram is enough to take at a time chelidonium utrumque celandine both sorts small celandine isusually called pilewort.