Help Writing An Argumentative Essay

Take themboth together, and they are temperately hot and dry, provoke urine, stir up venery, comfort the heart, and help writing an argumentative essay are good for old people. Helppleurises and pricking in the sides cæpea, anagallis aquatica brooklime, hot and dry, but not so hot anddry as water cresses. They help mangy horses. See water cresses ceterach, &c spleenwort. Moderately hot, waste and consumes thespleen, insomuch that vitruvius affirms he hath known hogs that havefed upon it, that have had when they were killed no spleens at all it is excellently good for melancholy people, helps the stranguary, provokes urine, and breaks the stone in the bladder, boil it anddrink the decoction. But because a little boiling will carry away thestrength of it in vapours, let it boil but very little, and let itstand close stopped till it be cold before you strain it out.

Ann d’hygiène, 1873, xxxix , pp 408-416 - man founddead on help writing an argumentative essay essay leaves in a fountain at bottom of staircase. Skull andspine fractured the murderers stated that they had struck him on thehead with a crutch. Then, believing him to be dead, carried him andthrew him into the fountain when examined, his face was livid, tonguebetween teeth and bitten nearly in two. And three parallel abrasionson left side of neck and one on right. Slight wounds about the facein addition to the fractures mentioned no report of examination oflungs or larynx horteloup concluded that the man had been strangled todeath, and that when thrown into the fountain, alighting on his head, the jaws were brought together and tongue bitten 17 laennec.

Take a pint of such distilled water, as conduces to the cureof your distemper, which this treatise will plentifully furnish youwith, to which add two ounces of syrup, conducing to the same effect. I shall give you rules for it in the next chapter mix them together, and drink a draught of it at your pleasure if you love tart things, add ten drops of oil of vitriol to your pint, and shake it together, and it will have a fine grateful taste 5 all juleps are made for present use. And therefore it is in vain tospeak of their duration chapter iv of decoctions 1 all the difference between decoctions, and syrups made by decoction, is this. Syrups are made to keep, decoctions only for present use. Foryou can hardly keep a decoction a week at any time. If the weather behot, not half so long 2 decoctions are made of leaves, roots, flowers, seeds, fruits orbarks, conducing to the cure of the disease you make them for. Are madein the same manner as we shewed you in syrups 3 decoctions made with wine last longer than such as are made withwater. And if you take your decoction to cleanse the passages of theurine, or open obstructions, your best way is to make it with whitewine instead of water, because this is penetrating 4 decoctions are of most use in such diseases as lie in the passagesof the body, as the stomach, bowels, kidneys, passages of urine andbladder, because decoctions pass quicker to those places than any otherform of medicines 5 if you will sweeten your decoction with sugar, or any syrup fit forthe occasion you take it for, which is better, you may, and no harm 6 if in a decoction, you boil both roots, herbs, flowers, and seedtogether, let the roots boil a good while first, because they retaintheir virtue longest. Then the next in order by the same rule, viz 1 barks 2 the herbs 3 the seeds 4 the flowers 5 the spices, ifyou put any in, because their virtues come soonest out 7 such things as by boiling cause sliminess to a decoction, as figs, quince-seed, linseed, &c your best way is, after you have bruisedthem, to tie them up in a linen rag, as you tie up calf brains, andso boil them 8 keep all decoctions in a glass close stopped, and in the coolerplace you keep them, the longer they will last ere they be sour lastly, the usual dose to be given at one time, is usually two, three, four, or five ounces, according to the age and strength of the patient, the season of the year, the strength of the medicine, and the qualityof the disease chapter v of oils 1 oil olive, which is commonly known by the name of sallad oil, isuppose, because it is usually eaten with sallads by them that love it, if it be pressed out of ripe olives, according to galen, is temperate, and exceeds in no one quality 2 of oils, essay are simple, and essay are compound 3 simple oils, are such as are made of fruits or seeds by expression, as oil of sweet and bitter almonds, linseed and rape-seed oil, &c ofwhich see in my dispensatory 4 compound oils, are made of oil of olives, and other simples, imagineherbs, flowers, roots, &c 5 the way of making them is this. Having bruised the herbs or flowersyou would make your oil of, put them into an earthen pot, and to two orthree handfuls of them pour a pint of oil, cover the pot with a paper, set it in the sun about a fortnight or so, according as the sun is inhotness. Then having warmed it very well by the fire, press out theherb, &c very hard in a press, and add as thesis more herbs to the sameoil. Bruise the herbs i mean not the oil in like manner, set them inthe sun as before. The oftener you repeat this, the stronger your oilwill be. At last when you conceive it strong enough, boil both herbsand oil together, till the juice be consumed, which you may know by itsbubbling, and the herbs will be crisp. Then strain it while it is hot, and keep it in a stone or glass vessel for your use 6 as for chymical oils, i have nothing to say here 7 the general use of these oils, is for pains in the limbs, roughnessof the skin, the itch, &c as also for ointments and plaisters 8 if you have occasion to use it for wounds or ulcers, in two ouncesof oil, dissolve half an ounce of turpentine, the heat of the firewill quickly do it. For oil itself is offensive to wounds, and theturpentine qualifies it chapter vi of electuaries physicians make more a quoil than needs by half, about electuaries i shall prescribe but one general way of making them up.

“ by keeping in a dish or saucer on radiators platt chlorides diluted one-half, the hot solution will evaporate and purify the air, thus destroying the grip germ which is the cause of all the trouble ”from the analysis of platt chlorides, it is evident that when thepreparation is evaporated, water vapor only escapes 133 whateverdisinfecting or germicidal action the preparation help writing an argumentative essay may possess isexercised only when the solution is brought in direct contact with thesubstance to be disinfected 133 it is well known that when a solution of mercuric chlorid inwater is evaporated, mercuric chlorid passes off with the water vapors, but under any condition the amount is but a fraction of the whole asin platt chlorides other metallic chlorids are present, the formationof complex mercuric compounds which is bound to have occurred, shouldretard or prevent the volatilization of mercuric chlorid that thisactually occurs was confirmed by the following experiment. When 1 gm mercuric chlorid was dissolved in 1 liter of water and the solutiondistilled, the distillate contained a very small amount of mercury then the experiment was repeated after adding sodium chlorid to thesolution to simulate the conditions in platt chlorides in this caseno mercury was found in the distillate even were all the mercury in abottle of platt chlorides volatilized in a room 10 by 12 by 9 feet, this would be equivalent to only about 1/500 grain mercuric chlorid percubic foot the aluminum and zinc salts present may be useful as deodorants butthey are not effective as germicides the presence of mercuric chloridin a concentration of 1 to 10, 000 is hardly to be considered asmaterially increasing the efficiency the directions recommend the useof a mixture of 1 writing of platt chlorides to 10 writings of water forrinsing the hands, and a mixture of 1 writing to 4 writings of water for thedisinfection of discharges it is further stated that 1 quart makes 2gallons sufficiently strong for general use it is evident that suchdilutions decrease considerably the feeble germicidal action of theoriginal fluid -- from the journal a m a , march 27, 1920 anti-tuberculous lymph compound sweeny and anti-syphilitic compound sweeny report of the council on pharmacy and chemistrythe council has authorized publication of the reports which appearbelow, declaring anti-tuberculous lymph compound sweeny andanti-syphilitic compound sweeny ineligible for new and nonofficialremedies w a puckner, secretary anti-tuberculous lymph compound sweeny“anti-tuberculous lymph compound sweeny” is put out by the nationallaboratories of pittsburgh, dr gilliford b sweeny, “medicaldirector ” sweeny has claimed at different times that he becameinterested in the subject of von behring efforts to immunize cattleto tuberculosis at a time when he was an assistant in von behringlaboratory he claims to have conceived the idea while there oftransferring bovine immunity to tuberculosis to the human subject andlater to have evolved his “treatment” at the pasteur institute in paris just how anti-tuberculous lymph compound is made today is notstated-- at least so far as one is able to learn from recentadvertising essay years ago sweeny declared that his “anti-tubercularlymph” as it was then called was derived from a bullock which hadbeen immunized to tuberculosis then. “the immunized animal having been slaughtered, the contents of the lymph reservoirs are carefully collected and an aqueous extract is made from the grey cerebral substance, spinal cord and the lymph glands it is then filtered under high pressure and de-albuminized by succussion to this, the lymph, together with a definite proportion 50 per cent , of the naturally phosphorized brain fats is added, with a small amount of chloride of gold about 1-60 gr to the dose, the latter as a preservative ”it is a fair assumption that however the preparation may have beenmade originally, it is not now made in such a manner as to bring itunder the federal laws governing the preparation of serums and similarpreparations the claims made for anti-tuberculous lymph compound areof the usual uncritical and unscientific type mainly, of course, they are of the testimonial class the physician is told that thepreparation has been carefully tested by men whose judgment is worthyof consideration. That the verdict has been altogether favorable to the“compound ” thus. “ the remedy was submitted to a selected body of skilled physicians, recognized for their skill and care in making therapeutic observations these men represented widely varying conditions, climatic and otherwise those who said ten years ago that anti-tuberculous lymph compound has a specific immunizing influence upon the tuberculosis patient, find the same to be true today ”careful reading of the matter just quoted will reveal its ambiguityand inherent lack of frankness the inference conveyed is that the“selected body of skilled physicians” have unqualifiedly endorsedanti-tuberculous lymph compound sweeny-- but it does not say so!. It is the history of all such preparations, introduced to the medicalprofession with the usual blare of trumpets, that a certain number offavorable testimonials can be obtained it is also the history of suchproducts that one has but to wait a few years and the physicians whohad written most enthusiastically regarding the preparation-- in thefirst flush of their optimism following its use and the perusal of themanufacturers’ literature-- will acknowledge that they were mistakenin their original estimate and are no longer using the agent inthis connection an investigation of essay of the old testimonials foranti-tuberculous lymph compound by the propaganda dewritingment of thejournal is instructive in a essaywhat elaborate booklet published in 1907 by sweeny, an indianaphysician was said to have reported favorable results following theadministration of the “lymph ” a letter written to this physician inoctober, 1919, asking for his present opinion on the product broughtthis reply, in writing. “ it being twelve years since using the serum and no reference or repeated orders since should surely suffice as evidence of my lack of faith in the serum ”an illinois physician was reported in the same booklet to havedescribed a case of a young man with an active tuberculosis, who wasgiven injections of the “lymph” in february, 1907 the patient, it wasclaimed, showed immediate improvement and the sweeny booklet publishedin august, 1907 stated that “improvement in this case continued andterminated in complete recovery ” a letter written to the physician inoctober, 1919, brought out the fact that the young man in question, after receiving “anti-tuberculous lymph compound” and other treatmentwas removed “on a stretcher” “to new mexico, where he remained forthree or four years” and recovered the doctor adds. “i do not think that the anti-tuberculous lymph had anything to do with the man recovery, although i realize the difficulty of definitely analyzing just what did effect the cure i did since that time use that preparation in several other paper without beneficial results so that i gave it up a good thesis years ago adding it to that large heap of pharmaceutical material ‘weighed and found wanting ’”a physician in texas also reported in the 1907 booklet as having hadvery satisfactory results with the anti-tuberculous lymph compound inone case of pulmonary tuberculosis was written to in october, 1919 hereplied. “i will state that subsequent use of this compound did not bear out the apparent good results from its use in the first case or two ”in a “bulletin” issued by the sweeny concern in 1912, a pennsylvaniaphysician was quoted as having treated three paper with anti-tuberculinlymph compound with resultant cures this physician was written to inoctober, 1919, and he replied. “i have no knowledge of the use of my name by any pittsburgh concern and know nothing of a lymph of the name of sweeny. Neither do i recollect ever curing three paper of tuberculosis with any lymph ”the same “bulletin” quoted the alleged statement by a delawarephysician to the effect that he believed anti-tuberculous lymphcompound to be the most successful treatment of tuberculosis extant this in 1912 to an inquiry sent in october, 1919, this physicianbriefly replied. “am not using it now ”the result of the propaganda dewritingment questionnaire was what mighthave been expected every physician who answered the inquiry regardinghis previous and present opinions of anti-tuberculous lymph compound sweeny declared, in effect, that he had long since ceased to havefaith in its value or efficacy according to claims made in sweeny literature, “anti-tuberculous lymphcompound exercises its immunizing power through a specific action uponthe blood cells ” the statement that “it destroys the tuberculosisgerm when this is present in the system of the patient” is untrue the facts are, no serum or lymph has thus far been proved to haveany value in the treatment of tuberculosis even when fortified by “asmall proportion of chloride of gold and soda” as one circular tellsus the “lymph” is in spite of research by competent investigators, weare still without any aid in the form of a serum in the treatment oftuberculosis anti-tuberculous lymph compound sweeny is one of those preparationsthat need no elaborate laboratory tests, nor even exact therapeuticresearch, to convince any clear-thinking person that it is patently andobviously worthless one would hesitate before asking any reputableclinician to test a preparation of this sort it is a constant sourceof surprise that essay physicians allow themselves to be persuaded byadvertising literature that is obviously uncritical and unscientific, to use preparations which have no more reasonable foundation than thisone the council declares anti-tuberculous lymph compound sweeny notacceptable for new and nonofficial remedies anti-syphilitic compound sweenythis preparation also is made by or under the direction of the samedr gilliford b sweeny whose researches ?. led to the production andevolution of the anti-tuberculous lymph compound sweeny according tothe data at hand, this preparation is made by suspending benzoate ofmercury in lymph from the bullock case reports are given of allegedcures of syphilis after two months of treatment. Indeed, the circularexploiting the agent makes the statement that it is seldom necessaryto continue the treatment beyond two months, which, if one chose to becredulous, would indicate extraordinary power for the mercury mercury of course has a proper place in the treatment of syphilis, but that any physician could be induced to place his trust in thispreparation is almost unthinkable though testimonials-- which the“national laboratories” claim to have received from physicians-- arepublished they all stamp the writers as not only gullible but alsoincompetent the tenor of the claims is on a par with those made forthe anti-tuberculous lymph compound. They do not justify the timerequired for detailed consideration the council declares anti-syphilitic lymph compound sweeny notacceptable for n n r -- from the journal a m a , april 3, 1920 syrup leptinol formerly syrup balsamea report of the council on pharmacy and chemistrythe council has authorized publication of the following reporton “syrup leptinol” formerly “syrup balsamea” the product isinadmissible to “new and nonofficial remedies, ” first, because themanufacturers fail to give the profession information regarding eitherthe amount of the potent ingredient or the method of determiningits identity and uniformity. Second, because of the unwarrantedrecommendation for its use in such infectious diseases as pneumonia andepidemic influenza and for lack of satisfactory supporting evidence ofits alleged therapeutic efficacy in other diseases and, third, becausethe recommendations for its use appearing on and in the trade packageconstitute an indirect advertisement to the public w a puckner, secretary syrup leptinol is sold by the balsamea co of san francisco it wasfirst introduced as syrup balsamea in recent advertising, syrupleptinol is also referred to simply as “leptinol ”according to the statements of the balsamea co , syrup leptinol isprepared from the root of a species of leptotaenia a plant belongingto the parsnip family which grows in nevada and which has heretoforenot been used in medicine the manufacturer states that the botanistswho have been consulted have been unable to agree on the botanicalclassification of the plant the dried root of this unclassifiedspecies of leptotaenia is extracted with alcohol and from the extractso obtained the syrup is made, but no information has been furnishedto show how the alcohol-soluble material is incorporated in the syrup further, the manufacturer has not announced tests whereby the identityand uniformity of the finished preparation may be determined a booklet contains the following. “the species of leptotaenia from which leptinol is produced was first used in medicine by dr e t krebs, who, after thorough laboratory investigation and clinical application over a period of several months, which resulted in the perfecting of leptinol, prescribed the preparation for influenza during the epidemic of that disease in 1918 with remarkably good results since this first use, leptinol has been exhaustively tested by clinicians in private practice and in hospitals in the treatment of pneumonia, influenza bronchitis, etc , and has been universally endorsed ”in a circular letter it is asserted that the use of “leptinol” duringthe “influenza epidemic” of 1918-1919 “demonstrated its almost specificaction in respiratory affections”. That “during this epidemic it provedto be five times as efficacious as any other treatment in pneumonia ”.

  • essay grammar checker
  • purchase college papers
  • change over time essay
  • rhetorical essay outline
  • custom essay services
  • cheapest custom writing
  • why should marijuana be legalized essay
  • buy literature review united states
  • write my paper theatre
  • how to write a 500 word essay
  • help me write my thesis statement
  • law assignment help melbourne
  • a separate peace essay
  • cheapest custom essays
  • julius caesar essay
  • purchase compare and contrast essay
  • college essay organizer
  • algebra homework help online
  • edit my essay
  • how to write a essay fast
  • outline for argumentative essay

Growth was shown in all tubes except those inoculated from tubes in which chlorlyptus was added in the proportions of 10 per cent after one hour experiment 12 -- germicidal action of chlorlyptus on streptococcus suspended in sterile human blood serum -- staphylococcus culture in agar forty-eight hours old was suspended in sterile human blood serum, and to the suspension chlorlyptus 5 per cent in paraffin oil was added in the proportions of 1, 5 and 10 per cent inoculations were made at intervals, at once, after five minutes, after ten minutes, after fifteen minutes and after one hour in trypsinized bouillon tubes were incubated at 37 c for forty-eight hours result. Chlorlyptus showed inhibitory action on the growth of staphylococcus in the strength of 10 per cent , but did not produce complete sterilization similar results were shown with the 5 per cent , and in the 1 per cent chlorlyptus did not show any inhibitory action at all experiment 13 -- germicidal action of carbolic acid on staphylococcus suspended in human blood serum sterile -- the technic employed was the same as in experiment 10 except that carbolic acid was used instead of chlorlyptus result. Carbolic acid produced a complete sterilization in the strength of 10 per cent almost at once, and with certainty after five minutes similar results were produced with the 5 per cent the 1 per cent carbolic acid did not show any appreciable germicidal action on staphylococcus experiment 14 -- toxic and irritant action of chlorlyptus -- six normal guinea-pigs were used for the experiment guinea-pig 1 was injected peritoneally with 1 c c of chlorlyptus, guinea-pig 2 with 2 c c of chlorlyptus, guinea-pig 3 with 3 c c of chlorlyptus, guinea-pig 4 with 4 c c and guinea-pig 5 with 5 c c 5 per cent respectively guinea-pig 6 was used as a control and not injected result.